The dirty secret
Most physics problems aren’t hard. They just look hard because they show up as a wall of text and your brain doesn’t know where to start. Professional engineers don’t solve problems by being smarter than you. They solve them by following a routine. Same routine every time. That routine is what this page is about. If you steal nothing else from this guide, steal this method.The 6-step routine
Read the problem twice. Slowly.
First read: get a feel for what’s happening.Second read: picture the scene in your head. If you can’t, the problem isn’t ready to be solved yet — keep reading until you can see it.
Draw it
A box for the object. Arrows for forces. Labels for distances and speeds. This is non-negotiable. Even bad drawings beat no drawings.Engineers draw things even when they don’t need to, because the drawing is where most mistakes get caught.
List what you know and what you want
Two columns:
This step is magical. Half the time, just writing this list makes the answer obvious.
| Known | Want |
|---|---|
| mass = 2 kg | final velocity = ? |
| initial v = 0 | |
| force = 5 N | |
| time = 3 s |
Pick the recipe (equation) that connects them
Look at the equation cheat-sheet for this chapter. Find the one whose left side is what you want and whose right side uses only what you know.If no single equation works, you’ll need two — one to find an intermediate value, one to finish the job.
Plug in numbers. Keep units.
Always carry units through the calculation. If the final units don’t match what you expected (e.g., you wanted meters but got seconds), you made a mistake. Units catch errors better than any other technique.
The decision tree: which approach to use?
When you don’t know whether to attack a problem with forces, energy, or momentum:Does it involve a collision or explosion?
Does it involve a collision or explosion?
Use momentum conservation. Compare before vs. after. Ignore the messy middle.
Does it involve heights, speeds, springs, or 'how fast at the bottom?'
Does it involve heights, speeds, springs, or 'how fast at the bottom?'
Use energy conservation. Add up KE and PE at the start, set equal to KE and PE at the end. Done.
Does it ask for acceleration or detailed motion at a specific moment?
Does it ask for acceleration or detailed motion at a specific moment?
Use Newton’s 2nd law (). Draw the free-body diagram, add forces, divide by mass.
Is the object just sitting there or moving at constant speed?
Is the object just sitting there or moving at constant speed?
Use equilibrium: net force = 0. All the forces have to cancel.
Common mistakes (and how to dodge them)
Cheat-sheet: the equations to know cold
| Topic | Equation | Plain English |
|---|---|---|
| Motion | New speed = old speed + acceleration×time | |
| Motion | Distance traveled while accelerating | |
| Motion | Speed after a distance, no time needed | |
| Force | Push equals stuff-times-speedup | |
| Weight | Weight = mass × gravity | |
| Energy | Energy of motion | |
| Energy | Energy stored by height | |
| Work | Force times distance | |
| Power | Energy per second | |
| Momentum | Oomph | |
| Pressure | Force per area | |
| Ohm’s Law | Voltage = current × resistance | |
| Electric power | Power = voltage × current | |
| Waves | Speed = frequency × wavelength |
Final advice from an engineer
Physics doesn’t reward speed. It rewards slowing down. When a problem feels overwhelming, you’ve skipped a step. Go back. Re-read. Re-draw. Re-list. The answer always comes once the picture in your head is clear. And remember the only thing that really matters:The universe follows rules. Once you know the rules, you can predict the future.That’s what physics is for. Welcome to the club.
Back to: Welcome
Revisit the table of contents.